This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 8, Issue 9
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 8, Issue 9
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 8, Issue 9
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Apr 11 18:07:52 CEST 2012
icann does use this measure against registrars, not too infrequently --srs (iPad) On 11-Apr-2012, at 21:34, Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote: > If RIPE NCC finally will force the LIRs to have correct abuse > contacts, it means that the LIR has to take care (well he inserted > the objects himself or delegated access to them to his customer), > its not interesting, if the customer provides correct details at all. > The LIR has to provide them, there are only objects inherited from > the LIR. > > And if he doesnt, well, punish the LIR ...
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 8, Issue 9
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 8, Issue 9
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]