This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Use of RIPE region space by out-of-region users, was RIPE policy
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Use of RIPE region space by out-of-region users, was RIPE policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Use of RIPE region space by out-of-region users, was RIPE policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Wed Mar 9 15:02:22 CET 2011
In message <4D777E1A.2010303 at powerweb.de>, Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg at powerweb.de> wrote: >Maybe RIPE should introduce real votes, where 50% are enough to accept >drafts. I was not aware that this is NOT currently the case. So, um, let me see if a get this... At this point in time, the folks in Egypt have a more democratic system in place than RIPE does. Is that about the size of it? >Just want to add my opinion here: >its quite stupid to maintain sender domains in blacklists, because >sender domains are usually faked anyway. I can only agree, and that's why I don't ``maintain sender domains in blacklists''. If you assumed that I did, then you assumed wrong. (Sorry. I don't have time to provide a tutorial about Received: headers, reverse DNS, and mail filtering just now. Maybe later.) Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Use of RIPE region space by out-of-region users, was RIPE policy
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Use of RIPE region space by out-of-region users, was RIPE policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]