Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES

Hi

I would be happy to focus on what Pepijn proposed, and what Brian
Nisbet promised to take to the NCC - detailed stats on LIR audits.

I would also welcome some input from ICANN on (for example) the SSAC
and other related work on whois accuracy, cooperation and engagement
with the various registries on mitigating abuse ..

thanks
--srs

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann.org> wrote:
>
> To be fair, I think it has been very hard to follow what has been written to the list over the last week or so. A significant number of messages have not been clearly written and may well not have been thought through before being sent.
>
> Focusing on the definitions issue, it would be useful to have an agreed set of definitions for some of the terms used. Is there a commonly agreed list?



-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)