This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Previous message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Next message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Wed Aug 10 16:24:21 CEST 2011
You wrote: [...] > Au contraire. We are talking about one and the same thing, when you > look at the sort of issue that's been plaguing RIPE over the past few > years - fake LIRs, RBN fronts getting themselves PI / PA blocks etc. To be fair, I think it has been very hard to follow what has been written to the list over the last week or so. A significant number of messages have not been clearly written and may well not have been thought through before being sent. Focusing on the definitions issue, it would be useful to have an agreed set of definitions for some of the terms used. Is there a commonly agreed list? Thanks, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Next message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]