This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Previous message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Next message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Wed Aug 10 16:30:14 CEST 2011
"Suresh Ramasubramanian" wrote the following on 10/08/2011 15:26: > Hi > > I would be happy to focus on what Pepijn proposed, and what Brian > Nisbet promised to take to the NCC - detailed stats on LIR audits. In relation to this, as an update, I started talking to the NCC about this. I don't know when I'll have an answer right now, but hopefully I shall have some more information for you tomorrow. > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Leo Vegoda<leo.vegoda at icann.org> wrote: >> >> Focusing on the definitions issue, it would be useful to have an agreed set of definitions for some of the terms used. Is there a commonly agreed list? Leo, that is a... complicated conversation at best. While I agree that more clarity and coherence would be very useful, what definitions are you actually looking for? Brian.
- Previous message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
- Next message (by thread): Education - was Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database - YES
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]