[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-09 New Policy Proposal (Frequent Update Request)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: anti-abuse-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg-
> admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Emilio Madaio
> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 4:50 PM
> To: policy-announce at ripe.net
> Cc: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net

> A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for
> discussion.
>
> You can find the full proposal at:
>
>     http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-09.html
>
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> before 7 December 2010.

Under “Arguments supporting the proposal”, the argument “More people will 
use the LIR Portal” is listed. I wonder why increased admin workload and 
increased system load would be advantages.

Under “Arguments opposing the proposal”, the proposal states that no 
disadvantages are foreseen. That view seems rather disconnected. Did we not 
already have a discussion where at least one representative of a large LIR 
indicated that clicking ”OK” for a zillion objects every 12 months would 
constitute a major burden?

-- 
Thor Kottelin
http://www.anta.net/