This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-09 New Policy Proposal (Frequent Update Request)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-09 New Policy Proposal (Frequent Update Request)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-09 New Policy Proposal (Frequent Update Request)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rob Evans
rhe at nosc.ja.net
Tue Nov 9 16:48:18 CET 2010
> already have a discussion where at least one representative of a large LIR > indicated that clicking ”OK” for a zillion objects every 12 months would > constitute a major burden? We're not a very large LIR, but we still have ~4,500 objects with our maintainers. We update objects when our contact details change. If a proposal similar to this is to go through, I'd like to be able to click a button that performs an ack for all objects with our maintainer. Rob
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-09 New Policy Proposal (Frequent Update Request)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-09 New Policy Proposal (Frequent Update Request)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]