[anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down

In message <AANLkTi=pcQVGC3gut2saQ3McwzJrs=CNF_1dNjw6Hny1 at mail.gmail.com>,
Esa Laitinen <esa.laitinen at iki.fi> wrote:

>On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com
>> wrote:
>
>> I confess that I am utterly baffled by your comment.  The message from BofA
>> seemed altogether clear and entirely straightforward and unambiguous to me.
>>
>> What is it, exactly, about that message that caused you to have any
>> difficulty
>> in "working it out"?
>>
>>
>Well, I for one had hard time to find the beef, and I'm language skills are
>reasonably good.

Assuming that the above was not a veiled attempt at humor, allow me to say
that some might find cause to question your assertion, embedded within the
assertion itself.

But yes, as I previously agreed (in another posting), the language of the
notice from BofA was indeed verbose, prolix, and failed to clarify the
issue that prompted the e-mail within the first sentence, as it should have.


Regards,
rfg