This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
- Previous message (by thread): Fwd: [anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Esa Laitinen
esa.laitinen at iki.fi
Wed Dec 22 09:36:57 CET 2010
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com > wrote: > I confess that I am utterly baffled by your comment. The message from BofA > seemed altogether clear and entirely straightforward and unambiguous to me. > > What is it, exactly, about that message that caused you to have any > difficulty > in "working it out"? > > Well, I for one had hard time to find the beef, and I'm language skills are reasonably good. The language is IMHO appropriate for letters sent to a lawyer, but doesn't necessarily properly communicate to anybody else. -- Mr. Esa Laitinen Tel. +41 76 200 2870 skype/yahoo: reunaesa -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20101222/82141a69/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): Fwd: [anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]