This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] FW: Policy Reciprocity
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FW: Policy Reciprocity
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FW: Policy Reciprocity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Wed Oct 21 10:32:47 CEST 2020
> On 21 Oct 2020, at 08:17, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> wrote: > > If there is a rationale for any of the RIPE policies, then that rationale should apply uniformly. ONLY to the resources that were issued under those policies. Frankly, it’s about time to stop obsessing about policies (for IPv4?? sheesh!!) and pay attention to outcomes. > I thought it was a mistake to treat legacy space differently when I first I learned about it 22 years ago, and I still think that it is a mistake. Fair enough Shane. [Though I don’t agree legacy space is/was a mistake.] However nobody can rewind history. So until someone invents time travel, we just have to live with what you think was a mistake.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FW: Policy Reciprocity
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FW: Policy Reciprocity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]