[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)

>
>> On 4 Feb 2019, at 13:58, Daniel Karrenberg <dfk at ripe.net> wrote:
>>
>> The question before us is: What is the minimum useful allocation?
> Well yes Daniel.
>
> But how long does that discussion last? Perhaps 5-10 years from now we’ll be debating policies on how the NCC allocates /30s or /31s of v4. :-)

No, because (hopefully) the prefix filters on the v4 Internet will never
EVER allow anything smaller than a /24 to be routed on the open Internet
...
Allowing LIRs to obtain their /22 - even if it is in up to 4 subnets -
will be a lot better than not being able to supply _any_ v4 addresses to
those late adopters due to only having the policies with /22 ...

-garry

--

Garry Glendown * Professional Services & Solutions

NETHINKS GmbH | Bahnhofstraße 16 | 36037 Fulda T +49 661 25 000 0 | F +49 661 25 000 49 | garry.glendown at nethinks.com
Geschäftsführer: Uwe Bergmann, Bastian Marmetschke Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Garry Glendown | AG Fulda HRB 2546

PGP Fingerprint: B1CF 4952 F6EB E060 8A10 B957 700E F97F B412 DD32

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20190204/ebab01f0/attachment.html>