This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon Feb 4 17:14:40 CET 2019
> On 4 Feb 2019, at 14:20, garry at nethinks.com wrote: > >> But how long does that discussion last? Perhaps 5-10 years from now we’ll be debating policies on how the NCC allocates /30s or /31s of v4. :-) > > No, because (hopefully) the prefix filters on the v4 Internet will never EVER allow anything smaller than a /24 to be routed on the open Internet ... That may well be true Garry. But just think of all the fine dinners and exotic travel that can be had as we talk and talk and talk about IPv4 allocation policy for ever more useless allocation units of ever smaller amounts of v4 space at the NCC. We can't allow reality to intrude on those sorts of policy discussions. :-)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]