This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Riccardo Gori
rgori at wirem.net
Wed May 11 09:22:50 CEST 2016
Il 11/05/2016 09:02, Roger Jørgensen ha scritto: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:44 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: >> you may find reading the actual last /8 policy informative. >> >>> Last /8 is not really get affected by this policy. >>> - Additional /22 IPv4 allocations can be only provided from address space >>> outside 185/8 >> this is misleading or just sadly misinformed >> >> last /8 is not an address range, it is a state reached once the ncc had >> only that address range and continues on irrespective of additions or >> subtractions of space to the ncc's pool. > minor correction, it is a state that was reached once IANA allocated the > last /8 to all the RIR's, and it affect _all_ address space after that point. > > > If I am not wrong standing on the information collected on this list the new allocation criteria was triggered when first allocation from 185/8 has been made. Please see Ingrid Wijte email 20/04/2016 to the list [...] The RIPE NCC started to allocate from 185/8 on 14 September 2012, when we could no longer satisfy a request for address space without touching 185/8. That moment triggered section 5.1 that states that RIPE NCC members can request a one time /22 allocation (1,024 IPv4 addresses). [...] My understanding is that the policy was already there but the community (we) at that date considered fair end up the good part of cake before triggering the new rule Rumors says that there are a lot of suspicius allocation done just one or two weeks before triggering the "last /8" regards Riccardo -- Ing. Riccardo Gori e-mail: rgori at wirem.net Mobile: +39 339 8925947 Mobile: +34 602 009 437 Profile: https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943 WIREM Fiber Revolution Net-IT s.r.l. Via Cesare Montanari, 2 47521 Cesena (FC) Tel +39 0547 1955485 Fax +39 0547 1950285 -------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re- plying to info at wirem.net Thank you WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC) -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160511/f4582954/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logoWirem_4cm_conR.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 41774 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160511/f4582954/attachment.jpg>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]