[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Riccardo Gori <rgori at wirem.net> wrote:

>
> Il 11/05/2016 09:02, Roger Jørgensen ha scritto:
>
> <snip>
>
> minor correction, it is a state that was reached once IANA allocated the
> last /8 to all the RIR's, and it affect _all_ address space after that point.
>
>
>
>
> If I am not wrong standing on the information collected on this list the
> new allocation criteria was triggered when first allocation from 185/8 has
> been made.
>
> Please see Ingrid Wijte email 20/04/2016 to the list
> [...]
> The RIPE NCC started to allocate from 185/8 on 14 September 2012, when we
> could no longer satisfy a request for address space without touching 185/8.
> That moment triggered section 5.1 that states that RIPE NCC members can
> request a one time /22 allocation (1,024 IPv4 addresses).
> [...]
>
>
... too early in the morning, you're right. My point was that it affect all
IPv4 addresses after that point in time, not just 185.




-- 

Roger Jorgensen           | ROJO9-RIPE
rogerj at gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger at jorgensen.no
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160511/55a11d99/attachment.html>