This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jørgensen
rogerj at gmail.com
Wed May 11 09:02:33 CEST 2016
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:44 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > you may find reading the actual last /8 policy informative. > >> Last /8 is not really get affected by this policy. >> - Additional /22 IPv4 allocations can be only provided from address space >> outside 185/8 > > this is misleading or just sadly misinformed > > last /8 is not an address range, it is a state reached once the ncc had > only that address range and continues on irrespective of additions or > subtractions of space to the ncc's pool. minor correction, it is a state that was reached once IANA allocated the last /8 to all the RIR's, and it affect _all_ address space after that point. -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj at gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]