This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv4 reserved space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 reserved space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 reserved space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
NTX NOC
noc at ntx.ru
Mon Jun 13 19:09:50 CEST 2016
Not correct. My opinion is that all IPs space should be completely free for all members. It's like letters in the alphabet. You should not pay for letters, you should not pay for your unique name+surname (symbols that allow to identify you like IP address numbers). So to allow progress to come in we need to use abilities, that we have, reasonably. And here I asked about reserved IPv4 space. I am here in this discussions because we try to help people to get IP space easy and faster. And I am show here that there a lot of space that could be used. Yuri On 11.06.2016 22:33, Sergey wrote: > Agree with Mikael. This is not a provocative question, but are NTX so > worried about this proposal because it would affect their businesses > selling and leasing IPv4 space? Their webpage mentions it at the top. > > The IP addresses aren't here to sell them. They're to be routed and > used. This is just a tool. The IPv6 deployment is the only solution.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 reserved space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 reserved space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]