[address-policy-wg] IPv4 reserved space

Agree with Mikael. This is not a provocative question, but are NTX so 
worried about this proposal because it would affect their businesses 
selling and leasing IPv4 space? Their webpage mentions it at the top.

The IP addresses aren't here to sell them. They're to be routed and 
used. This is just a tool. The IPv6 deployment is the only solution.

On 06/11/16 22:27, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, NTX NOC wrote:
>
>> About IPv6 - still now in Russia there are no Home ISPs who gives 
>> IPv6 by default to customers. Nobody wants it, nobody needs it.
>
> ... and yet here you are, asking for obscure IPv4 blocks that are 
> non-working in most operating systems available today, whilst all of 
> them support IPv6 already.
>
> So "need" is in the eye of te beholder it seems.
>

-- 
Kind regards,
CTO at
*Foton Telecom CJSC*
Tel.: +7 (499) 679-99-99
AS42861 on PeeringDB <http://as42861.peeringdb.com/>, Qrator 
<https://radar.qrator.net/as42861>, BGP.HE.NET <http://bgp.he.net/AS42861>

http://ipv6actnow.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160611/f17458b3/attachment.html>