[address-policy-wg] IPv4 reserved space

When a resource is scarce, either you define a high-enough price (GSM frequencies for instance) or you enforce a policy on how it's used.
The issue is that even if you free 2 or 3 /8 from 240/4 or DoD, that's still a scarce resource, given the current growth and the forthcoming IoT invasion.

David Ponzone



> Le 13 juin 2016 à 19:09, NTX NOC <noc at ntx.ru> a écrit :
> 
> Not correct. My opinion is that all IPs space should be completely free
> for all members. It's like letters in the alphabet. You should not pay
> for letters, you should not pay for your unique name+surname (symbols
> that allow to identify you like IP address numbers).
> 
> So to allow progress to come in we need to use abilities, that we have,
> reasonably. And here I asked about reserved IPv4 space.
> 
> I am here in this discussions because we try to help people to get IP
> space easy and faster. And I am show here that there a lot of space that
> could be used.
> 
> Yuri
> 
>> On 11.06.2016 22:33, Sergey wrote:
>> Agree with Mikael. This is not a provocative question, but are NTX so
>> worried about this proposal because it would affect their businesses
>> selling and leasing IPv4 space? Their webpage mentions it at the top.
>> 
>> The IP addresses aren't here to sell them. They're to be routed and
>> used. This is just a tool. The IPv6 deployment is the only solution.
> 
> 
> 
> ***********************************************************************************************************
> Le service MailSecure d'IPeva confirme l'absence de virus et de spam dans ce message.
> ***********************************************************************************************************
> 
>