This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sylvain Vallerot
sylvain.vallerot at opdop.net
Mon Jun 13 17:15:37 CEST 2016
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, On 09/06/2016 11:43, Denis Fondras wrote: > I fully agree with you but it seems some think that prefixes from last-/8 is not > intended to be used and distributed as we used to. Which I can comprehend, I agree with this : remaining IPs are not intended to be used as we used to. But they are still meant to be distributed to end users, aren't they ? Best regards, Sylvain -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iF4EAREIAAYFAldezhgACgkQJBGsD8mtnRGuaAEAm9Z8unbCXbXSIpw+9pxG2ce9 lBFdNK+hp572a3zmuIQA/1ibyaANpmeapUtLCmRp6ioSTt8YW5TbdQvQohM+D7NR =+T7o -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]