This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aled Morris
aled.w.morris at googlemail.com
Mon Jun 13 17:29:41 CEST 2016
On 13 June 2016 at 16:15, Sylvain Vallerot <sylvain.vallerot at opdop.net> wrote: > I agree with this : remaining IPs are not intended to be used as we used > to. > > But they are still meant to be distributed to end users, aren't they ? > RIPE-649 "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region" Section 5.1 Allocations made by the RIPE NCC to LIRs ... 3. The LIR must confirm it will make assignment(s) from the allocation. ... It doesn't say who these assignments are to, they could be to the LIR itself for their own use (as it will be in the case of end-users who have become LIRs purely to obtain some "psuedo-PI" address space.) Aled -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160613/23b4f294/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]