[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

Hi,

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:43:09AM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Is there an official statement on this point ? Can LIR from the last-/8
> distribute addresses to customers or only use it on CGN ?

Policy is clear on that: you can use the addresses any way you want.

*BUT*: do not come back later and ask for more if you used them carelessly
- thus, it may be generally a good idea to use the last scraps of IPv4 to
enable communication between your IPv6 customer base and those folks out
there that still have no IPv6.

So it's sort of implied that the intended usage is "for IPv6<->IPv4
gatewaying" (or to dual-stack your mail and DNS servers, etc. etc.),
but policy doesn't formally say so.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160609/3c922c53/attachment.sig>