<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Agree with Mikael. This is not a provocative question, but are NTX so worried about this proposal because it would affect their businesses selling and leasing IPv4 space? Their webpage mentions it at the top. The IP addresses aren't here to sell them. They're to be routed and used. This is just a tool. The IPv6 deployment is the only solution. <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 06/11/16 22:27, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:alpine.DEB.2.02.1606112126170.28955@uplift.swm.pp.se" type="cite">On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, NTX NOC wrote: <blockquote type="cite">About IPv6 - still now in Russia there are no Home ISPs who gives IPv6 by default to customers. Nobody wants it, nobody needs it. </blockquote> ... and yet here you are, asking for obscure IPv4 blocks that are non-working in most operating systems available today, whilst all of them support IPv6 already. So "need" is in the eye of te beholder it seems. </blockquote> <div class="moz-signature">-- Kind regards, CTO at Foton Telecom CJSC Tel.: +7 (499) 679-99-99 AS42861 on <a href="http://as42861.peeringdb.com/">PeeringDB</a>, <a href="https://radar.qrator.net/as42861">Qrator</a>, <a href="http://bgp.he.net/AS42861">BGP.HE.NET</a> <a href="http://ipv6actnow.org/">http://ipv6actnow.org/</a></div> </body> </html>