[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

Hi,

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 02:34:28AM +0300, Elvis Daniel Velea wrote:
> I do not intend to submit an appeal unless this policy proposal moves 
> forward to Review Phase.. so I am waiting for the decision of the 
> proposer - as the website says :)

So we have two participants now trying to force the chair's hand, right?

What you say above can be paraphrased to "if we *do* move it forward, 
you're going to submit an appeal", right?

Alexsey says "there is no consensus, so it should be withdrawn".

I hope you understand why this is fully and totally unacceptable (to avoid
using far less polite words).  You are free to *think* what you expect the
result will be, and you are free to appeal afterwards if you do not accept
the summary and reasoning(!) given by the chair(s), but threatening action
beforehand in case the desired outcome is not to your liking is... amazing.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160722/a2881a22/attachment.sig>