[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 47, Issue 9

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Shahin Gharghi <shahin at gharghi.ir> wrote:

> Hi
>
> > I would be happy to support returning this proposal to the discussion
> phase, but only if there are compelling reasons to do so. To date nobody
> has made the case for taking that action. Although some have asked for
> this, nobody has put forward anything to justify these requests. The case
> has not been made yet. It?s up to you and your fellow travellers to make
> that case.
> >
>
> The problem is: The person who should justify the criticisms, never
> does! And he is
> supporting the proposal so that he will never return it to the
> discussion phase...
>

I'm not quite sure what you're trying to say here.

I completely agree that the person(s) who should justify the criticisms,
never do(es).

One of those persons is *you*.

There are no other persons, than the ones who voice the criticism itself,
who need to justify that criticism.

I, or any other WG member, or WG chair, are in no way obliged to write your
justification for you.

-- 
Jan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150706/82cfa510/attachment.html>