[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 47, Issue 9

Hello, WG.

I understand you will approve this proposal in any case, you have made a decision in January and should comply with formalities.

However I see many companies began to open multi LIR accounts and receive additional allocations.

E.g.
netname: NL-PCXCOP-20150707
netname: NL-PCXMAD-20150707

netname: DK-BORNFIBER5-20150709
netname: DK-BORNFIBER9-20150709

netname: ES-RULZ2-20150710
netname: ES-RULZ3-20150710

netname: ES-SUNNY2-20150710
netname: ES-SUNNY3-20150710

Traders don't want to lose their profit and will begin to provide services to help open new accounts for the same company and companies will be do it by themselves.

Thus IPv4 pool will be exhausted during 1-2 years. 

I understand the RIPE NCC dislike someone makes profit using RIPE's resources but we should not make emotional decisions.

06.07.2015, 15:49, "Shahin Gharghi" <shahin at gharghi.ir>:
> Hi
>
>>  I would be happy to support returning this proposal to the discussion phase, but only if there are compelling reasons to do so. To date nobody has made the case for taking that action. Although some have asked for this, nobody has put forward anything to justify these requests. The case has not been made yet. It?s up to you and your fellow travellers to make that case.
>
> The problem is: The person who should justify the criticisms, never
> does! And he is
> supporting the proposal so that he will never return it to the
> discussion phase...
>
> --
> Shahin Gharghi

-- 
Kind regards,
Petr Umelov