This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 47, Issue 9
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "ALLOCATED UNSPECIFIED"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 47, Issue 9
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shahin Gharghi
shahin at gharghi.ir
Mon Jul 6 14:48:10 CEST 2015
Hi > I would be happy to support returning this proposal to the discussion phase, but only if there are compelling reasons to do so. To date nobody has made the case for taking that action. Although some have asked for this, nobody has put forward anything to justify these requests. The case has not been made yet. It?s up to you and your fellow travellers to make that case. > The problem is: The person who should justify the criticisms, never does! And he is supporting the proposal so that he will never return it to the discussion phase... -- Shahin Gharghi
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] "ALLOCATED UNSPECIFIED"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 47, Issue 9
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]