[address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:19:51AM +0300, Petr Umelov wrote:
> If you go here https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-01
> you can read next:
> 
> To put this into perspective, the RIPE NCC has allocated about 6,100 /22s from 185/8. In the past six months, the average rate has been around 245 allocations per month. Therefore, the transfers which the policy proposal tries to discourage constitute about 10% of the total allocations in recent months. 
> 
> Why do you calculate the part of transfers for last 6 months when /8 is allocated earlier and the part of transfer for HOLE /8 is only 3%?

Because, as has been demonstrated to you, this trend has a clear upward
curve - and the absolute numbers do not really matter if specific behaviour
is seen that the community does not want.

Your attempt to argue with the small numbers seen so far has been made
in the review phase, and didn't have the desired effect then.  So, it is
not a *new* argument.

So, please stop now, or you WILL be moderated.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150701/c085853a/attachment.sig>