This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Opteamax GmbH
ripe at opteamax.de
Wed Jul 1 10:32:30 CEST 2015
Hey Guys, <irony> why not drop whole "last /8 policy" and give the rest of IPV4 to the first one asking for it? I'd need those IPs, so I am the first one asking. As soon as there are no IPs in last /8 left, this proposal is obsolete. </irony> Sorry could not resist! Jens Am 1. Juli 2015 10:19:51 MESZ, schrieb Petr Umelov <petr at fast-telecom.net>: >If you go here >https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-01 >you can read next: > >To put this into perspective, the RIPE NCC has allocated about 6,100 >/22s from 185/8. In the past six months, the average rate has been >around 245 allocations per month. Therefore, the transfers which the >policy proposal tries to discourage constitute about 10% of the total >allocations in recent months. > >Why do you calculate the part of transfers for last 6 months when /8 is >allocated earlier and the part of transfer for HOLE /8 is only 3%? > >You also could review the period when the part of transfers was the >same as the part of allocated blocks and write that the part of >transfers from /8 is 100% > >01.07.2015, 11:04, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net>: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:46:07AM +0300, Petr Umelov wrote: >>> If this proposal closes multi LIR accounts hole, I will support it. >But I can't do it now. >> >> The argument "this proposal does not go far enough and loopholes >remain >> in other areas" has been heard and is considered addressed. >> >> If you want a change that addresses people opening multiple LIRs, >please >> bring up a policy proposal to that extent. >> >> Gert Doering >> -- APWG chair >> -- >> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? >> >> SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard >> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann >> D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) >> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 > >-- >Kind regards, >Petr Umelov > > >!DSPAM:637,5593a3ec280481407632425! Opteamax GmbH - RIPE-Team Jens Ott Opteamax GmbH Simrockstr. 4b 53619 Rheinbreitbach Tel.: +49 2224 969500 Fax: +49 2224 97691059 Email: jo at opteamax.de HRB: 23144, Amtsgericht Montabaur Umsatzsteuer-ID.: DE264133989
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]