[address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01

I already wrote about such "trend".

Why did you consider such "trend" as season rising or something else?

So I consider "10%" just to make "necessary picture" and this number is not representative.

P.S. You can block anybody in this list if you don't like the true. I think it's completely clear to all people what is happening here.

01.07.2015, 11:34, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net>:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:19:51AM +0300, Petr Umelov wrote:
>>  If you go here https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-01
>>  you can read next:
>>
>>  To put this into perspective, the RIPE NCC has allocated about 6,100 /22s from 185/8. In the past six months, the average rate has been around 245 allocations per month. Therefore, the transfers which the policy proposal tries to discourage constitute about 10% of the total allocations in recent months.
>>
>>  Why do you calculate the part of transfers for last 6 months when /8 is allocated earlier and the part of transfer for HOLE /8 is only 3%?
>
> Because, as has been demonstrated to you, this trend has a clear upward
> curve - and the absolute numbers do not really matter if specific behaviour
> is seen that the community does not want.
>
> Your attempt to argue with the small numbers seen so far has been made
> in the review phase, and didn't have the desired effect then. So, it is
> not a *new* argument.
>
> So, please stop now, or you WILL be moderated.
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- APWG chair
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

-- 
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503