[address-policy-wg] Opposing policy 2015-01

If you go here https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-01
you can read next:

To put this into perspective, the RIPE NCC has allocated about 6,100 /22s from 185/8. In the past six months, the average rate has been around 245 allocations per month. Therefore, the transfers which the policy proposal tries to discourage constitute about 10% of the total allocations in recent months. 

Why do you calculate the part of transfers for last 6 months when /8 is allocated earlier and the part of transfer for HOLE /8 is only 3%?

You also could review the period when the part of transfers was the same as the part of allocated blocks and write that the part of transfers from /8 is 100%

01.07.2015, 11:04, "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net>:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:46:07AM +0300, Petr Umelov wrote:
>>  If this proposal closes multi LIR accounts hole, I will support it. But I can't do it now.
>
> The argument "this proposal does not go far enough and loopholes remain
> in other areas" has been heard and is considered addressed.
>
> If you want a change that addresses people opening multiple LIRs, please
> bring up a policy proposal to that extent.
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- APWG chair
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

-- 
Kind regards,
Petr Umelov