This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 using an IPv4 policy to force IPv6 adoption
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on proposal 2014-04 (Remove the IPv6 Requirement for receiving address space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 using an IPv4 policy to force IPv6 adoption
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aleksi Suhonen
ripe-ml-2012 at ssd.axu.tm
Fri Jan 23 11:02:01 CET 2015
Hello, I'd like to state again, that sticking to the current policy is only hurting people that have already adopted IPv6 using PI space. "The bad guys" that aren't even planning to ever adopt IPv6 will happily reserve an IPv6 block just to get more IPv4 addresses. I hope this message gets across to the people who oppose 2014-04. You're not helping your own cause. For more information, read the archives of the 2014-04 discussion from last year. -- +358 4567 02048 / http://www.trex.fi/ Aleksi Suhonen / TREX Regional Exchanges Oy `What I need,' shouted Ford, by way of clarifying his previous remarks, `is a strong drink and a peer-group.' -- Douglas Adams, Life the Universe and Everything
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Comments on proposal 2014-04 (Remove the IPv6 Requirement for receiving address space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2014-04 using an IPv4 policy to force IPv6 adoption
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]