[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 using an IPv4 policy to force IPv6 adoption

Hi Aleksi,

> I'd like to state again, that sticking to the current policy is only
> hurting people that have already adopted IPv6 using PI space. "The bad
> guys" that aren't even planning to ever adopt IPv6 will happily reserve
> an IPv6 block just to get more IPv4 addresses.

And I state again, changing instead of removing the policy will make the 
same.
Just allowing IPv6 PI space to be valid to request the IPv4 will do the 
same.

And as stated before, lot of LIRs are adopting IPv6 only because the 
were forced to request an IPv6 Alloc.

All those future LIRs who, as many cases, would go in for IPv6 only 
because they are forced to request the IPv6, with this removal, they 
wont do.

Please, stop saying the removal is the only solution when, at least 
there is one solution much better than this.

Of course, the community said yes so all we (the ones opposing) will 
accept as is. We are not going to ragequit. Consensous happens and, as 
we say here, it never rains please everyone. (Dont know if the 
translation is good, but for sure you all understand what I mean)

Cheers,

-- 
Daniel Baeza