[address-policy-wg] RIPE IPv4 Allocation Policy

Hi Walter,

be assured that the large telcos also need IPv4 addresses. If we return 
to need based policy, they will use up all remaining IPv4 addresses in a 
few days. This does not help anybody.

But if you think anything should be changed, then please write a new 
policy proposal and start the discussion.

Regards,
Wilhelm


Am 28.08.2015 um 14:17 schrieb SBS - Support:
> Hi Tore,
>
> That is like running away from responsibility of policing usage based 
> on need and promoting illicit IP trading. If need is justified there 
> has to be a process to allocate additional IP resources.
>
> Regards,
> Walter
>
>
> ---- On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:55:07 +0200 *Tore Anderson <tore at fud.no>* 
> wrote ----
>
>     * SBS - Support <support at sonabusiness.nl
>     <mailto:support at sonabusiness.nl>>
>
>     > The RIPE policy of allocating only a PA /22 to new LIR's and not
>     > allocating any further IPv4 resources is highly detrimental to the
>     > growth of new upcoming organisations and protects legacy Telco
>     > operators, what are your thoughts on reviewing this and coming up
>     > with a process to allocate further resources to new LIR's if the
>     need
>     > can be justified.
>
>     If we hadn't done it that way, we would today not have had IPv4
>     addresses at all to allocate to new upcoming organisations.
>
>     None.
>
>     Zip, zilch, zero.
>
>     How would that have been any less detrimental?
>
>     Tore
>
>
>
>
> This electronic message contains information from Sona Business 
> Services (SBS) which may be privileged and confidential. The 
> information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or 
> entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware 
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of 
> this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic 
> message in error, please notify us by telephone or e-mail and delete 
> this message immediately. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150828/4cb9c099/attachment.html>