This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] RIPE IPv4 Allocation Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE IPv4 Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE IPv4 Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Fri Aug 28 16:53:50 CEST 2015
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015, at 14:50, Wilhelm Boeddinghaus wrote: > be assured that the large telcos also need IPv4 addresses. If we return > to need based policy, they will use up all remaining IPv4 addresses in a > few days. This does not help anybody. There are 2 views of "needs-based": - allocate as much as needed (that clearly won't last long) - only allocate IF needed (what would be supposed to make things last longer - but it's gone)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE IPv4 Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE IPv4 Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]