This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] RIPE IPv4 Allocation Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE IPv4 Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE IPv4 Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at fud.no
Fri Aug 28 14:44:13 CEST 2015
* SBS - Support <support at sonabusiness.nl> > That is like running away from responsibility of policing usage based > on need and promoting illicit IP trading. If need is justified there > has to be a process to allocate additional IP resources. Where do you propose we locate these mythical «additional IP[v4] resources» we should proceed to allocate based on justified need, exactly? Tore
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE IPv4 Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE IPv4 Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]