[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

Vladimir, +1
23 Апр 2015 г. 17:24 пользователь "Vladimir Andreev" <
vladimir at quick-soft.net> написал:

> I am just speaking about how easy requirement about making assignments can
> be passed.
>
> 23.04.2015, 17:19, "Matyas Koszik" <koszik at atw.hu>:
> > On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Opteamax GmbH wrote:
> >>  On 23.04.2015 15:39, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
> >>>  If we suppose having multiple /22 per LIR is abusing then main
> >>>  "abuser" is RIPE NCC since RIPE NCC makes transfers and LIR merging
> >>>  allowing to receive second /22 etc.
> >>  So you agree my initial reply that actually the change does not go far
> >>  enough, it'd be better to completely prohibited selling IP (v4) and
> >>  instead enforce withdrawing of not announced IP-Space aand returning
> >>  it into the pool?
> >>
> >>  That way I am pretty sure we could quickly loosen the current /8
> >>  policy and return to a policy allowing requests of more then one /22
> >>  if need is shown .... and need may NOT be selling, but that'd be
> >>  forbidden anyway then ;)
> >
> > Announcing globally was never a requirement to receive IP addresses from
> > RIPE, and changing policy retroactively is not a nice thing to do. And
> you
> > wouldn't deter this kind of 'abuse' at all, if you're in the internet
> > business I'm sure you know how easy it is to set up an announcement for a
> > prefix.
> >
> > Matyas
>
> --
> With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
> General director, QuickSoft LLC
> Tel: +7 903 1750503
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20150423/bb8c85e7/attachment.html>