[address-policy-wg] Transfer Requirements for IPv4 Allocations

I am just speaking about how easy requirement about making assignments can be passed.

23.04.2015, 17:19, "Matyas Koszik" <koszik at atw.hu>:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Opteamax GmbH wrote:
>>  On 23.04.2015 15:39, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
>>>  If we suppose having multiple /22 per LIR is abusing then main
>>>  "abuser" is RIPE NCC since RIPE NCC makes transfers and LIR merging
>>>  allowing to receive second /22 etc.
>>  So you agree my initial reply that actually the change does not go far
>>  enough, it'd be better to completely prohibited selling IP (v4) and
>>  instead enforce withdrawing of not announced IP-Space aand returning
>>  it into the pool?
>>
>>  That way I am pretty sure we could quickly loosen the current /8
>>  policy and return to a policy allowing requests of more then one /22
>>  if need is shown .... and need may NOT be selling, but that'd be
>>  forbidden anyway then ;)
>
> Announcing globally was never a requirement to receive IP addresses from
> RIPE, and changing policy retroactively is not a nice thing to do. And you
> wouldn't deter this kind of 'abuse' at all, if you're in the internet
> business I'm sure you know how easy it is to set up an announcement for a
> prefix.
>
> Matyas

-- 
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503