Vladimir, +1 <div class="gmail_quote">23 Апр 2015 г. 17:24 пользователь "Vladimir Andreev" <<a href="mailto:vladimir@quick-soft.net">vladimir@quick-soft.net</a>> написал: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I am just speaking about how easy requirement about making assignments can be passed. 23.04.2015, 17:19, "Matyas Koszik" <<a href="mailto:koszik@atw.hu">koszik@atw.hu</a>>: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Opteamax GmbH wrote: >> On 23.04.2015 15:39, Vladimir Andreev wrote: >>> If we suppose having multiple /22 per LIR is abusing then main >>> "abuser" is RIPE NCC since RIPE NCC makes transfers and LIR merging >>> allowing to receive second /22 etc. >> So you agree my initial reply that actually the change does not go far >> enough, it'd be better to completely prohibited selling IP (v4) and >> instead enforce withdrawing of not announced IP-Space aand returning >> it into the pool? >> >> That way I am pretty sure we could quickly loosen the current /8 >> policy and return to a policy allowing requests of more then one /22 >> if need is shown .... and need may NOT be selling, but that'd be >> forbidden anyway then ;) > > Announcing globally was never a requirement to receive IP addresses from > RIPE, and changing policy retroactively is not a nice thing to do. And you > wouldn't deter this kind of 'abuse' at all, if you're in the internet > business I'm sure you know how easy it is to set up an announcement for a > prefix. > > Matyas -- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503 </blockquote></div>