This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed May 7 11:17:29 CEST 2014
Hi,
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:57:25PM -0500, Lu Heng wrote:
> I personally believe we might no longer need to distinguish PI and
> PA--it might solve all the question all together.
We tried to go there, the WG rejected the proposal... and I can
understand that, as the complications in the actual implementations
are significant.
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140507/10d3f277/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]