This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jørgensen
rogerj at gmail.com
Thu May 8 00:00:04 CEST 2014
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:57:25PM -0500, Lu Heng wrote: >> I personally believe we might no longer need to distinguish PI and >> PA--it might solve all the question all together. > > We tried to go there, the WG rejected the proposal... and I can > understand that, as the complications in the actual implementations > are significant. Hmm as I remember there was no rejection of the idea, more a cancellation of the started work due to the implication and complication involved in getting done. -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj at gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger at jorgensen.no
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 10
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]