[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Policy Proposal (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)

On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 05:13:20PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> > On one hand, I don't quite see why the current requirement for IPv6 PA is
> > there, and therefore it seems obvious that having IPv6 PI should be a
> valid
> > requirement as well.
>
> Historically it was put in there as an encouragement for "last /8" LIRs
> to "do something with IPv6"...
>
>
I know that, but that's not quite what I meant.

What I meant is that I don't see why the current requirement for IPv6 PA is
there, but that the current document didn't already have IPv6 PI as a valid
requirement.

Not either-or.

-- 
Jan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140505/4680d472/attachment.html>