[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Policy Proposal (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)

Hi,

On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 05:13:20PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> On one hand, I don't quite see why the current requirement for IPv6 PA is
> there, and therefore it seems obvious that having IPv6 PI should be a valid
> requirement as well.

Historically it was put in there as an encouragement for "last /8" LIRs
to "do something with IPv6"...

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20140505/e2677ce3/attachment.sig>