[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)

Hi,

On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:25:58AM +0100, Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) wrote:
> For that reason, I dont support this proposal.
> 
> We, as community, must try to foment IPv6 over everything.

I agree that we need to see more IPv6 deployment.

As far as your opposition to the proposal goes, I consider it to be
heard and addressed (because the group considers the requirements in
the current policy to be insufficient to actually further IPv6 deployment,
and as such, sticking to it is not helping to reach that goal).

Since there is quite strong support otherwise, and we only need *rough*
consensus, we'll go forward with it anyway.  Consensus does not have
to be unanimous.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20141201/8ba583c7/attachment.sig>