[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)

El 01/12/2014 9:38, Jan Ingvoldstad escribió:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT)
> <d.baeza at tvt-datos.es <mailto:d.baeza at tvt-datos.es>> wrote:
>
>     At least Im not the only one saying IPv6 isnt really deployed.
>
>
> I'm not saying it isn't really deployed, so if you counted me as some
> sort of support to your claim, you need to rethink that.
>
>
>     As you all can see, Only a 5% of Google traffic is v6.
>
>
> Did you look at the curve for the uptake of v6 traffic?

Yes I did.

>
> You've been making theses "IPv6 isn't really deployed" claims for a
> pretty long time now.

Pretty long time? What is "long time" for you? Few months? A year?

>
> Meanwhile, IPv6 traffic at Google has more than tripled.

Please, of course, from 1% to 2% is double. And from 1% to 5% is 
quintupled. But still being only a 5%...

Will it keep the curve or will it relax? Dont really know, we'll see in 
the upcoming years.

> Prediction:
>
> You'll be making the claim when IPv6 traffic is 10%, 20%, 40%, and even 50%.

Bad prediction. Between 10% and 20%, for this year, I think is a good 
number.
We are a very little ISP and around 15% of our traffic is v6 when only a 
half of our customers have v6 capable módems and from that 50%, not all 
of them have a v6 ready cpe(lot of winxp still outside). Of course, 99% 
of them is to google services (youtube,gmail,search...) and if we as 
little isp can do it, Im sure more big ISPs than us can do it too.

So please, dont make predictions on what Im going to claim as you dont 
know me :)

If you feel I said something not respectfull, Im very sorry, english is 
not my native language and sometimes is hard to me to explain what Im 
thinking with the proper words.

To this topic, I love the signature of Gert:

"have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?"

Cheers,

-- 
Daniel Baeza