[address-policy-wg] 2014-04 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Relaxing IPv6 Requirement for Receiving Space from the Final /8)

El 01/12/2014 12:58, Gert Doering escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:25:58AM +0100, Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) wrote:
>> For that reason, I dont support this proposal.
>>
>> We, as community, must try to foment IPv6 over everything.
>
> I agree that we need to see more IPv6 deployment.

Thanks :D

> As far as your opposition to the proposal goes, I consider it to be
> heard and addressed (because the group considers the requirements in
> the current policy to be insufficient to actually further IPv6 deployment,
> and as such, sticking to it is not helping to reach that goal).

Im ok with that. I was just pointing my reasons.

> Since there is quite strong support otherwise, and we only need *rough*
> consensus, we'll go forward with it anyway.  Consensus does not have
> to be unanimous.

Agree. If there is consensus the proposal should go forward. :)


-- 
Daniel Baeza