[address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)

Hi,

small clarification...

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:08:45PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:05:14PM +0200, Roger Jørgensen wrote:
> > Think I'll just "hijack" this discussion ;p
> > 
> > I fully support the idea of uniting PI and PA into one policy, it's
> > just numbers anyway.
> 
> Uh, you're confusing two issues.  *This* thread was about being able
> to turn IPv*4* PI into PA, while keeping the distinction.
> 
> Andrea Cima presented at the RIPE meeting, and I expect to see a summary
> and "next steps" from him soon - especially for the bits that are missing
> policywise, and Erik Bais volunteered to work with us to fix those.

This is where *I* was confused about things - Erik Bais volunteered, but
not to fix this particular bit about IPv4 PI, but to work out something
about IPv4 PI transfers.  Sorted out by private mail in the meantime.

But I think we have found another volunteer for the minimum allocation
size obstacle regarding IPv4 PA->PI conversion.  Also related to IPv4 PI,
but differently...

(And I can already hear Randy Bush tell me that our way of thinking is
too complicated...  maybe it is, but we're such orderly folks here... we 
can do this all by policy, without lawyers :-) )

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20131021/0c10a552/attachment.sig>