This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Mon Oct 21 21:35:17 CEST 2013
Gert, you still seem to be a bit stressed out - no relaxing weekend?! ;-) On 21.10.2013 20:40, Gert Doering wrote: > But I think we have found another volunteer for the minimum allocation > size obstacle regarding IPv4 PA->PI conversion. Also related to IPv4 PI, > but differently... This should read "regarding IPv4 PI->PA conversion" - as it concerns converting "ASSINGED PI" IPv4 space of LIRs into "ALLOCATED PA" space for the respective LIR. The (main) question here is: what to do with PI space that is smaller than the minimum allocation size. Cheers, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]