[address-policy-wg] New Policy Proposal (PI - PA Transfer)

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:05:14PM +0200, Roger Jørgensen wrote:
>> Think I'll just "hijack" this discussion ;p
>>
>> I fully support the idea of uniting PI and PA into one policy, it's
>> just numbers anyway.
>
> Uh, you're confusing two issues.  *This* thread was about being able
> to turn IPv*4* PI into PA, while keeping the distinction.
>
> Andrea Cima presented at the RIPE meeting, and I expect to see a summary
> and "next steps" from him soon - especially for the bits that are missing
> policywise, and Erik Bais volunteered to work with us to fix those.

oh, see that now, sorry.


>> However, the presentation on the topic from the three (just two
>> onsite) volunteers was very interesting, the consequences and how much
>> it affected was amazing. How did we dig us into such a mess?
>
> *That* is actually about IPv6 land (PA/PI unification, only having a
> single "type of addresses" anymore), and I'll open a separate thread on
> that "soonish".

'ki, we're waiting:-)



-- 

Roger Jorgensen           | ROJO9-RIPE
rogerj at gmail.com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger at jorgensen.no