This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Wed Sep 28 17:13:59 CEST 2011
On 28/09/2011 15:45, Turchanyi Geza wrote: > 1, If the number of IPv6 PI slots allocated reaches a certain level then > the policy should be immediatly reviewed; The number of the IPv6 PI slots > allocated must not exceed the numbers of the LIRs in the regions; however, > a lower limit would be also fine for me. I don't think there is a requirement to force a review at a particular number of registrations. Géza, if you disagree with this, there is nothing to stop you from submitting a new policy proposal when the number of ipv6 pi registrations reaches whatever level you believe is sufficient. > 2, The policy should include the warning that ISPs might filter off the > announcements of small sized slots from their routing table. This is already in the policy: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-523#routability Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]