This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Turchanyi Geza
turchanyi.geza at gmail.com
Wed Sep 28 16:45:39 CEST 2011
Hi, I can not support this policy unless explicit restrictions added. 1, If the number of IPv6 PI slots allocated reaches a certain level then the policy should be immediatly reviewed; The number of the IPv6 PI slots allocated must not exceed the numbers of the LIRs in the regions; however, a lower limit would be also fine for me. 2, The policy should include the warning that ISPs might filter off the announcements of small sized slots from their routing table. Thanks, Géza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20110928/e975c375/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]